The short answer
Sellers want to know what viewers thought, and the agent who did six viewings on Saturday wants to go home. Record a one-minute voice note in the car after each viewing, then let ChatGPT turn the week's notes into a dated feedback log and a short update email for the seller, with no viewer names in it. Any offer goes to the top with a reminder to send it in writing straight away, because the law won't let it wait for Friday.
- Who it’s for
- Sales negotiators and branch managers at estate agencies in the UK who send sellers regular viewing feedback
- Time to set up
- 30 minutes once, then a minute a viewing and 10 minutes a week per property
- Difficulty
- Beginner
- Monthly cost
- £0
The quick version
Time: About 10 minutes a property a week, free
Paste the week's viewing notes, get any offer flagged at the top, a dated feedback log and a short seller update with no viewer names.
Not ready to automate yet? Paste this prompt into a free ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini account, fill in the [square brackets] and do the job by hand today.
You help an estate agent in the UK turn my own viewing notes into a feedback log and a weekly update for the seller. Use ONLY what the notes say: never invent a viewer, a comment, a figure or a date. PART 1, OFFERS FIRST: if any note mentions an offer, or a price a viewer says they would pay, put it at the very top as: 'OFFER: [viewing ref], £[amount], [date], [conditions as stated]. Send to the seller in writing today if not already sent.' Also say how far it is below or above the asking price in £. Do not put offer amounts in the update; write 'You received [number] offer(s) this week, which we sent to you separately on [date] (fill in the date you sent it).' PART 2, FEEDBACK LOG: a table, one row per viewing, with: date and time, viewing ref (V1, V2...), recorded by (my name and role), viewer's view (start with 'Viewer said' or 'Viewer felt', because it is their opinion, not fact), position as stated by the viewer (not checked), next step. PART 3, SELLER UPDATE: an email under 200 words with: how many viewings and on which days; what viewers liked and their concerns, saying how many said each (for example '2 of 4'); price comments, as the viewers' views; next steps such as second viewings; and one suggestion, labelled as our suggestion. RULES: no viewer names, phone numbers or email addresses, and no personal details such as age, health, nationality, religion or family, even if they are in the notes. Describe viewers only by their buying position, as they stated it. Never make a viewer sound keener or better placed than the notes say. Never promise a sale or a price. If anything is unclear, add a short note in brackets saying in plain words what to check, for example (check the time with the viewer). British English, warm and straightforward. My name and role: [paste]. Property and asking price: [paste]. This week's notes: [paste]Example outputfrom invented details
Example output: shows what a good result looks like. Every name, business and address is fictional. Your results will vary, even with the same prompt. Check every figure, price and date before you rely on it, and check anything about tax or MTD against GOV.UK.
What we gave it (fictional): My name and role: Jo Reid, senior negotiator. Property and asking price: 42 Example Avenue, £325,000. Notes: Tue 20 Oct, 17:30, V1. Couple, first-time buyers, they say they've got a mortgage agreed in principle. Loved the garden and how light the lounge is. Second bedroom felt small to them. Think it's about ten grand too much. Want a second viewing Saturday with her dad. Tue 20 Oct, 18:15, V2. Downsizer, says their own house is under offer. Loved the kitchen, said it's a lovely bright house. Worried about road noise at the front. Going to think about it. Wed 21 Oct, 12:00, V3. Investor, says cash buyer. Said they'd offer £305,000 if the seller can complete before Christmas. Asked how old the boiler is. Thu 22 Oct, 18:00, V4. Family, two kids, need to sell, not on the market yet. Liked the school catchment, thought the kitchen was dated. Not taking it further.
OFFER: V3, £305,000, Wed 21 October 2026, if the seller can complete before Christmas (as stated). £20,000 below the £325,000 asking price. Send to the seller in writing today if not already sent.
| Date and time | Ref | Recorded by | Viewer's view | Position (as stated, not checked) | Next step |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 20 Oct, 17:30 | V1 | Jo Reid, senior negotiator | Viewer said they loved the garden and the light in the lounge; felt the second bedroom was small; felt the price was about £10,000 too high | First-time buyers, mortgage agreed in principle | Second viewing Saturday (time not in the notes) |
| Tue 20 Oct, 18:15 | V2 | Jo Reid, senior negotiator | Viewer said they loved the kitchen and found the house bright; worried about road noise at the front | Own house under offer | Thinking about it |
| Wed 21 Oct, 12:00 | V3 | Jo Reid, senior negotiator | Viewer asked the age of the boiler | Cash buyer | Offer made, see top |
| Thu 22 Oct, 18:00 | V4 | Jo Reid, senior negotiator | Viewer liked the school catchment; felt the kitchen was dated | Needs to sell, not yet on the market | Not proceeding |
Subject: 42 Example Avenue: this week's viewings
Hi [seller name],
We showed 42 Example Avenue four times this week: twice on Tuesday, and once each on Wednesday and Thursday.
What viewers liked: the light (2 of 4), the garden (1 of 4), the kitchen (1 of 4) and the school catchment (1 of 4).
Concerns: the size of the second bedroom (1 of 4), road noise at the front (1 of 4), and one viewer felt the kitchen was dated.
Price: one viewer felt the asking price was about £10,000 too high.
You received 1 offer this week, which we sent to you separately on [date] (fill in the date you sent it).
Next steps: one viewer has asked for a second viewing on Saturday, and one viewer is thinking it over.
Our suggestion: one viewer asked about the boiler's age, so if you can find the last service record, we'll have it ready for the next viewing.
Best wishes,
Jo Reid
Weekdays checked in Python: 20 October 2026 Tuesday, 21 Wednesday, 22 Thursday, 24 Saturday. Sums: £325,000 - £305,000 = £20,000. Counts checked by hand against the notes: light V1 and V2 (2 of 4); garden V1; kitchen liked V2, dated V4; catchment V4. V4's children and "her dad" are in the notes but left out of the log and the update on purpose. The offer rule is from the Estate Agents (Undesirable Practices) (No. 2) Order 1991, Schedule 3, as made. The two notes in brackets in the example output (the second viewing's time and the date the offer went to the seller) are the prompt flagging gaps, as it's told to: fill them in before you send.
Make it run itself by FridayIf the OFFER line is news to you, send it to the seller in writing now. Then read the update and send it yourself.
There’s one piece of viewing feedback the law won’t let you save for Friday’s round-up: an offer. Under a 1991 Order, it’s an undesirable practice for an estate agent to fail “to forward to his client promptly and in writing accurate details” of any offer from a prospective buyer (legislation.gov.uk). The buyer who says “we’d go to £305k” while you’re locking the front door has just made your afternoon’s admin a legal job.
Everything else, the light, the “small” second bedroom, the road noise, the viewer who loved the kitchen and the one who called it dated, is what sellers ring on Monday to ask about. Most of it is still in your head, or in six half-finished notes from Saturday. This guide turns a one-minute voice note after each viewing into a dated log and a short Friday update, written without viewer names and with offers pulled out to send the same day.
What does this automation do?
- After each viewing, you record a one-minute note in your own words, following the same five prompts every time.
- Once a week, ChatGPT turns each property’s notes into a feedback log, with opinions marked as opinions and dated.
- It drafts a short update for the seller, with counts (“2 of 4 mentioned the light”), no viewer names and any offer pulled to the top for you.
- You check and send it from Gmail. Make can log each note as it arrives, if you’d like.
What do you need before you start?
- A phone that records voice memos or dictates text, and a few minutes after each viewing.
- A free ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini account, plus Google Sheets and Gmail.
- Your booking confirmation, where you can add a line telling viewers how their feedback is used.
How do I set it up?
Step 1: Decide what you’ll say after every viewing
A voice note that starts “so, yeah, they seemed nice” is no use to anyone. Use the same five prompts every time, out loud:
- Which viewing: day, time, property and a reference (V1, V2), not the viewer’s name.
- Their position, as they told you: first-time buyer, cash, own home under offer, not yet on the market.
- What they liked.
- What put them off, including anything about price, in their words.
- Next step: second viewing, thinking it over, not proceeding, or an offer.
The reference matters. The name lives in your booking system already. The note doesn’t need it, and neither does the seller.
Step 2: Tell viewers how their feedback is used
The ICO says you must tell people your purposes, how long you’ll keep their data and who it’s shared with, which it calls “privacy information”, and give it “at the time you collect their personal data from them” (ICO). So add one line to the viewing confirmation:
After your viewing, we’ll pass your feedback to the seller without your name, and keep our notes in line with our privacy notice.
On the lawful basis, the ICO says legitimate interests is most likely to fit where you use information “in ways they would reasonably expect” and “in ways that have a minimal impact on their privacy”, and that it comes with a three-part test: “identify a legitimate interest; show that the use of personal information is necessary to achieve it; and balance it against the interests, rights and freedoms of the person” (ICO). Passing anonymous feedback to a seller is about as expected as it gets, but write your test down once and check it with whoever handles data protection at your agency. This is our reading, not legal advice.
Step 3: Record the note before you start the engine
Sixty seconds, in the car, before the next appointment overwrites the last. Either record a voice memo or tap your phone keyboard’s dictation button and speak into a note, which gives you text straight away and skips the transcription step later.
Say what the viewer said, not what you hope the seller hears. If a viewer says the second bedroom felt small, it goes in, even if you think it’s a perfectly good box room. The ICO wants records of opinion to “make clear that it is opinion rather than fact” (ICO), and sellers trust feedback that sounds like real people.
Step 4: Turn the week’s notes into a log and an update
Paste one property’s notes for the week into the prompt below, with your name, your role and the asking price. You get three parts back:
- Offers first, with the amount, the date, any conditions and the gap to the asking price.
- A feedback log with one row per viewing. Each view starts “Viewer said” or “Viewer felt”, and each row names who recorded it. That follows the ICO’s line that a record of an opinion should “state the date and the author’s name and position”.
- A seller update under 200 words: how many viewings, what was liked, the concerns with counts, price comments, next steps and one suggestion.
Paste the log rows into a Google Sheet with the columns Date and time, Property, Ref, Recorded by, Viewer’s view, Position (as stated), Next step. The ICO’s data minimisation principle says personal data should be “adequate”, “relevant” and “limited to what is necessary”. So the prompt strips names, contact details and personal circumstances even if you said them in the car. “Two kids” helps nobody sell a house.
Step 5: Send offers the same day, in writing
The Order’s Schedule 3 is short and worth reading in full (legislation.gov.uk):
- Paragraph 2: forward to the client “promptly and in writing accurate details” of any offer, unless the client has said in writing they don’t want offers of that kind.
- Paragraph 1: no misrepresenting, “knowingly or recklessly”, the existence of or details of any offer, or “the existence or status of any prospective purchaser”.
The Schedule adds that a conditional offer still counts as an offer, and that a buyer’s “status” includes “the financial standing of that purchaser”. That’s why the log says “position as stated by the viewer, not checked” and why the prompt is told never to make a viewer sound keener or better placed than they are. “Cash buyer” in your note is what they said. It isn’t proof of funds. Since 2017 there’s one exception to forwarding: you don’t have to pass on an offer if you can’t carry out the money laundering checks (customer due diligence) the 2017 Regulations require on the person making it (legislation.gov.uk).
Paragraph 3(e) defines “forward” as “despatch to the client by hand, post or fax at the address or to the number given by the client to the estate agent”. Email isn’t on that list, and the only later changes legislation.gov.uk records, made by the Money Laundering Regulations 2017, don’t touch that definition (legislation.gov.uk). So email the offer to the seller straight away for speed, and send a written copy by post or by hand the same day. Keep a copy of both. That’s our reading of the wording, not case law: we found no court or regulator decision on email either way. If you’d rather rely on email alone, ask your redress scheme or a solicitor first.
Step 6: Check, send and tidy up
Before you send the update:
- Every count matches the notes (“2 of 4” really is two).
- No names, ages, family details or anything a viewer told you in confidence.
- The offer line in the update matches what you actually sent, with the date filled in where the draft leaves a note in brackets.
- The suggestion is yours to stand behind, not just ChatGPT’s.
Then tidy up. The ICO says “You must not keep personal data for longer than you need it” and that you should periodically review what you hold, and “erase or anonymise it when you no longer need it” (ICO). Once the log row is checked, delete the voice memo. Keep the log for as long as your agency’s retention policy says, and add the sheet to it if it isn’t there yet.
Step 7: Optional: let Make log your notes automatically
Make can pick up each note you email to yourself, write the log row and nudge you about offers. You’ll need Make’s built-in AI credits for the writing step, and a paid OpenAI API account only if you send audio rather than typed notes.
Before you paste your key into Make
If you use the OpenAI option: give this scenario its own expiring OpenAI API key. In Project settings › Limits, set a monthly spend limit and turn on Enforce a hard limit, because “Spend alerts alone don’t stop API traffic.” (You need to be the project owner to set it.) Once the cap is hit, OpenAI stops the calls (spend can go slightly over), which beats a surprise bill. Key leaked? Replace it at once on the API keys page (OpenAI: Best practices for API key safety).
- Scenario schedule (a setting, not a module): At regular intervals, every 120 minutes.
- Gmail › Watch emails on a label such as “Viewing notes”. Email or share each note to yourself with that label.
- OpenAI (ChatGPT, Whisper) › Generate a transcription, only if the note is audio. Make’s docs say it “Transcribes an audio to text” and it needs an OpenAI connection.
- OpenAI (ChatGPT, Whisper) › Simple text prompt with a one-viewing version of the prompt: return the log row and an OFFER line if there is one. Make says this runs “without an OpenAI account or connection”; on Free plans it supports only GPT-5 nano (Make).
- Google Sheets › Add a Row to the feedback log.
- Gmail › Create a draft email to yourself, with a filter so it only runs when the output contains OFFER. It’s a draft: you write and send the real one to the seller.
Make Free gives 1,000 credits a month. Each 2-hourly check uses 1 credit even when it finds nothing, so 360 a month. Each audio note then uses about 3 more (transcription, the prompt and the new row), so roughly 210 a month fits; a typed note skips the transcription, so about 320, and each offer adds 1 for the draft. Simple text prompt is charged in credits by tokens: Make’s table gives GPT-5 nano 18,080 input tokens and 2,260 output tokens per credit, so a one-viewing note should come in around a credit (not verified: how Make rounds part credits). Transcription uses the OpenAI API, not your ChatGPT account, and is paid as you go on OpenAI’s billing page. The Friday update stays manual, because a person should read it before a seller does. We haven’t run this scenario end to end; Step 4 does the same job by hand.
The copy-paste prompt
You help an estate agent in the UK turn my own viewing notes into a feedback
log and a weekly update for the seller. Use ONLY what the notes say: never
invent a viewer, a comment, a figure or a date. PART 1, OFFERS FIRST: if any
note mentions an offer, or a price a viewer says they would pay, put it at the
very top as: 'OFFER: [viewing ref], £[amount], [date], [conditions as stated].
Send to the seller in writing today if not already sent.' Also say how far it
is below or above the asking price in £. Do not put offer amounts in the
update; write 'You received [number] offer(s) this week, which we sent to you
separately on [date] (fill in the date you sent it).' PART 2, FEEDBACK LOG: a
table, one row per viewing, with: date and time, viewing ref (V1, V2...),
recorded by (my name and role), viewer's view (start with 'Viewer said' or
'Viewer felt', because it is their opinion, not fact), position as stated by
the viewer (not checked), next step. PART 3, SELLER UPDATE: an email under 200
words with: how many viewings and on which days; what viewers liked and their
concerns, saying how many said each (for example '2 of 4'); price comments, as
the viewers' views; next steps such as second viewings; and one suggestion,
labelled as our suggestion. RULES: no viewer names, phone numbers or email
addresses, and no personal details such as age, health, nationality, religion
or family, even if they are in the notes. Describe viewers only by their
buying position, as they stated it. Never make a viewer sound keener or better
placed than the notes say. Never promise a sale or a price. If anything is
unclear, add a short note in brackets saying in plain words what to check, for
example (check the time with the viewer). British English, warm and
straightforward. My name and role: [paste]. Property and asking price:
[paste]. This week's notes: [paste]
What can go wrong?
- An offer in the Friday email. It has to go “promptly and in writing”. The prompt pulls offers to the top so they can’t hide in a paragraph about the garden.
- Flattering a buyer. “Cash buyer, very keen” when they said “we might be cash” is a misrepresentation waiting to happen. Write what they said.
- Names creeping in. If you say a name in the car, the prompt drops it, but check anyway. The seller doesn’t need it.
- Editing out the bad news. A seller who only hears “lovely garden” for six weeks will be surprised by the price conversation. The counts keep it honest.
- Audio that never gets deleted. Voice memos pile up on phones. Delete them once the row is checked.
- Outside England. The offer rule isn’t just for England. The Order is made under the Estate Agents Act 1979, which covers the whole UK (“This Act extends to Northern Ireland”, legislation.gov.uk), and the Schedule has its own Scottish wording. legislation.gov.uk doesn’t show an extent for the Order itself, so this rests on the Act; in Scotland or Northern Ireland, ask your redress scheme what it expects.
The same notes make the next listing easier: the Rightmove listing description guide works better when you know what viewers loved, and the portal lead auto-reply books the next round of viewings. For valuation calls and seller meetings, the meeting notes to follow-up email guide does the same trick. One practical automation like this, with the £ and the hours it saves, lands in your inbox every Friday if you join our free email.
Do it yourself or pay for a tool?
This guide’s setup costs £0 a month. If you’d rather pay for something ready-made, here’s what the main paid tools cost, what they do that our setup doesn’t, and when they’re worth it.
| Paid tool | Price | What it does that ours doesn’t | When to pay instead | Price seen on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viewing Feedback | £59 a month (“One plan. Everything included.”)VAT: Not stated on vendor pageFree option: 14-day free trial; “Card needed, charged only if you stay” | Asks the viewers themselves for feedback by link or QR code (“Anonymous by default”), collates the answers and gives the seller “a report that updates itself” or a one-page PDF, with unlimited branches and users | You'd rather have the viewers' own ratings than your summary, and want sellers to see a live report without waiting for Friday | viewingfeedback.com pricing for Viewing Feedback |
| Otter.ai (Pro) | USD 8.33 per user a month, shown with the annual option (“save 51%”). No GBP priceVAT: Not stated on vendor pageFree option: USD 0 Basic, with “300 monthly transcription minutes” | Records and transcribes in its own iOS and Android apps, with keyword search across your notes | Your notes run long and you want every one transcribed and searchable without pasting | otter.ai pricing for Otter.ai (Pro) |
Prices are what each company showed on its own pricing page on the date given, in the currency it uses (we haven’t converted US dollars), and can change. Check before you buy. We don’t earn anything from these links. How we check prices.
Frequently asked questions
Do we have to pass every offer to the seller?
Yes. Under the Estate Agents (Undesirable Practices) (No. 2) Order 1991, it's an undesirable practice for an estate agent not to forward to the client "promptly and in writing accurate details" of any offer from a prospective buyer, unless the client has said in writing they don't want that kind of offer. So offers go to the seller the same day, not in the weekly update.
Can we share what viewers said with the seller?
This guide shares feedback without names, which keeps it to what the seller needs. The ICO says legitimate interests is most likely to fit where you use people's information "in ways they would reasonably expect" with a minimal privacy impact, and that you must give privacy information when you collect the data. Tell viewers when they book. This is our reading, not legal advice.
How should a feedback log record a viewer's opinion?
As opinion, with a date and an author. The ICO says records "should make clear that it is opinion rather than fact", and that a record of an opinion should state "the date and the author's name and position". That's why every log row starts "Viewer said" or "Viewer felt" and names the negotiator.
How long should we keep the voice notes?
No longer than you need them. The ICO says "You must not keep personal data for longer than you need it" and that you should periodically review what you hold and "erase or anonymise it when you no longer need it". We delete the audio once the log row is checked and keep the log for as long as your retention policy says.
Can Make write the log without an OpenAI account?
For typed notes, yes. Make's OpenAI app docs say you can prompt AI "without an OpenAI account or connection" using the Simple text prompt module, which on Free plans supports only GPT-5 nano and uses Make credits. Turning audio into text with Generate a transcription needs an OpenAI connection, which means a paid OpenAI API account with credit.
Should we just record the viewers instead?
We don't, and this guide doesn't. Your one-minute summary is what the seller needs, and it keeps the viewer's voice and details out of the file. If you want viewers' own words, a tool that asks them for feedback by link, like the one in the comparison below, does that with their knowledge.
Sources
- legislation.gov.uk: Estate Agents (Undesirable Practices) (No. 2) Order 1991, Schedule 3 (as made)
- legislation.gov.uk: Money Laundering Regulations 2017, Schedule 7, paragraph 12 (amends Schedule 3 of the 1991 Order)
- legislation.gov.uk: changes affecting the 1991 Order
- legislation.gov.uk: Estate Agents Act 1979, section 36 (extent)
- ICO: Data minimisation
- ICO: Storage limitation
- ICO: The right to be informed
- ICO: Legitimate interests
- Make: OpenAI (ChatGPT, Whisper) app
- Make: Gmail app
- Make: Google Sheets app
This guide is general information, not legal, tax or financial advice. Tool prices and screens change; we re-check every guide regularly. Spotted something out of date? Tell us and we’ll fix it.